Key Takeaways
- Mortgage rates could stay high in 2026 even if the Fed cuts interest rates, limiting relief for homebuyers and businesses.
- Long-term bond yields are being driven more by inflation expectations and investor confidence than by the Fed’s short-term rate decisions.
The big question facing bond markets in 2026—and thus anyone hoping to buy a home—is whether long-term rates will stay sluggishly high even as the Federal Reserve cuts rates.
It’s a scenario that could diminish the impact of the Fed’s rate cuts, as homebuyers hold off amid elevated mortgage rates and businesses opt against longer-term investments. It is, however, one that several analysts think may occur next year.
Those analysts foresee interest rate charts “steepening,” with long-term rates remaining high while short-term rates decline. That can happen when investors anticipate more inflation in the future, which prompts them to demand higher interest rates so that rising prices don’t erode their returns.
“The overall direction of the market is one of a consistent, grinding bull steepening trend,” wrote Ian Lyngen, head of U.S. rates strategy at BMO Capital Markets, while acknowledging 2026 is a “year with more questions than answers.”
Why This Matters
If long-term rates stay high, Fed rate cuts may not translate into cheaper mortgages or easier financing. For homebuyers and businesses, that could mean borrowing costs remain stubbornly expensive well into 2026.
It wouldn’t be the first time that long-term rates stay elevated or even rise despite the Fed cutting its influential interest rate. That’s more or less what’s happened since the Fed started its most recent rate cuts in September 2024.
The Fed has now cut short-term rates by 175 basis points since then, with the latest cut occurring in December. Even so, the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury, a key benchmark used in mortgage rates, has risen from around 3.70% in September 2024 to around 4.15% for much of December 2025
It is the Fed’s “easing paradox,” Bob Elliott, CEO of Unlimited Funds, wrote in a commentary. The central bank can choose to cut short-term rates, but the bond market “is not complying” and driving long-term rates higher, Elliott wrote.
“It should challenge the view of the Fed as masters of the universe when it comes to the ability to pump markets,” Elliott wrote. “Even an incremental easing step is backfiring.”
It may be because some investors are viewing the Fed as “too proactive given conditions,” he wrote, with an economy that may not need many more rate cuts.
Three Scenarios
The 10-year yield was around 4.15% for much of December and could rise more next year, wrote Padhraic Garvey, an economist at the Dutch bank ING. He sees the 10-year yield potentially hitting 4.5% by mid-year before drifting back down to around 4.25%.
“We can see upside to the 10-year yield dominating through the first half of 2026, as we see more tariff impact on prices than we’ve seen so far,” Garvey said, though he noted that inflation likely “gets tamed” later in 2026 by weaker housing markets.
That scenario assumes the Fed cuts interest rates twice next year, driving the federal funds rate to a target range of 3% to 3.25%.
However, he also plotted out two alternative scenarios where the Fed cuts rates to around 2%—one with justification and the other without. Long-term yields would react quite differently in either case.
The first would require recession-like conditions, giving the Fed ample reason to cut rates further to stimulate the economy. Bond markets would accept those actions and the 10-year yield could go down to 3%, over a whole percentage point from today’s levels.
The other scenario is cutting without reason, such as President Donald Trump’s selection of Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s replacement causing the Fed to swing “super dovish.” Under that scenario, the Fed would cut rates “far in excess of what’s required in an attempt to juice the economy in good time for the midterm elections.”
“While Treasuries love rate cuts, they won’t like them much given this cocktail,” Garvey wrote, citing the rising risk of an inflation resurgence and markets protesting the Fed’s tarnished credibility.
“We prefer our base view, as it’s the most likely,” he wrote. “It’s also, by definition, more likely than either of these alternative parallel universes, both of which are quite troubling.”
