If you just skim the White House’s own material, the Great Healthcare Plan sounds like the rare health care proposal that tries to speak directly to your wallet.
The White House says the plan “will slash prescription drug prices, reduce insurance premiums, hold big insurance companies accountable, and maximize price transparency.” according to the official fact sheet on WhiteHouse.gov. The same fact sheet says the administration wants to stop sending “billions in extra taxpayer-funded subsidy payments” to insurers and instead “send that money directly to eligible Americans to allow them to buy the health insurance of their choice.”
When I read that pitch, it sounds almost too good: lower list prices, lower premiums, and cash in your hands instead of insurer accounts.
President Donald J. Trump Calls on Congress to Enact The Great Healthcare Plan
What the plan says it will actually change
Behind the slogans, the Great Healthcare Plan is really a bundle of older conservative health care ideas wrapped in a new label.
The framework calls for codifying “Most-Favored-Nation” style prescription drug deals so that Americans would pay prices comparable to the lowest prices drug companies charge in other countries, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) and the White House plan. CRFB explains that this idea builds on earlier Trump-era executive actions that tried to tie certain Medicare drug payments to international price benchmarks, though those efforts ran into legal challenges and were never fully implemented.
Related: Medicare mistakes seniors wish they’d known sooner
The White House also wants Congress to let more “verified safe” drugs move over the counter, a change it says would cut doctor visits and boost price competition by letting you buy more medications directly, as cited by the WhiteHouse.gov Great Healthcare Plan page. CRFB notes that this shift would likely reduce insurance premiums and federal subsidies somewhat, since some spending would move outside of traditional coverage and into retail purchases you make yourself, according to its blog on the plan.
On premiums, the plan calls for restoring cost-sharing reduction (CSR) funding to insurers, reversing the Trump-era decision to halt those payments, which had pushed up silver-tier premiums on Affordable Care Act (ACA) exchanges. The White House argues that funding CSRs “would save taxpayers at least $36 billion and reduce the most common Obamacare plan premiums by over 10%,” citing Congressional Budget Office estimates in its fact sheet.
More Medicare/Medicaid
- AARP raises a red flag on Social Security, Medicare
- If your Medicare plan was canceled, do this now
- AARP explains huge new Medicare change coming soon
- Health care costs are the wild card in year-end tax planning
Finally, the plan targets pharmacy benefit manager (PBM) “kickbacks,” saying it would end payments that “deceptively raise the cost of health insurance” by flowing through opaque middlemen, according to the Great Healthcare Plan summary. Curbing PBM rebates and related overpayments could add to the package’s modest deficit reduction, though the exact savings depend on how Congress drafts the details, as seen in CRFB analysis.
Those are tangible levers, but the real budget hinge is what happens to ACA subsidies going forward.
Direct cash instead of insurer subsidies
Politically, the most marketable part of this plan is the promise to get money to you instead of to your insurer.
President Trump said “the government is going to pay the money directly to you… and then you take the money and buy your own health care,” in a White House video releasing the plan, according to CBS News. The White House fact sheet echoes that language, saying the proposal “stops sending big insurance companies billions in extra taxpayer-funded subsidy payments” and instead directs those dollars “to eligible Americans” so they can buy insurance they choose.
On its face, that sounds like more control for you and less of your tax money going into insurer pockets. When you dig into the numbers, however, independent analysts are less impressed.
CRFB estimates that the plan’s cost-saving pieces, including CSR funding, expanded OTC drugs, PBM changes, and drug price reforms, would cut primary deficits by roughly $50 billion over ten years, according to its Jan. 15 breakdown. But the group warns that the ACA subsidy redesign “could generate modest additional savings or increase primary deficits by up to $350 billion” over a decade, depending on whether it replaces only “extra” enhanced subsidies or also repackages base ACA subsidies.
Related: AARP sends vital message on Social Security, Medicare
In other words, the direct cash promise might make you feel richer in the short run if you see a deposit hit your account, but the federal government could be on the hook for more than under current law, creating pressure for future tax changes or spending cuts that hit somewhere else.
Transparency, OTC drugs, and what actually changes for you
Even if Congress never passes the full framework, the transparency and OTC pieces tell you where policy pressure is heading.
The Great Healthcare Plan would require any provider or insurer that takes Medicare or Medicaid to “prominently post their pricing and fees in their place of business,” with the White House saying this will make sure patients “are never surprised when they receive a bill” and can “shop for a better deal or better care.” according to the official fact sheet. Trump, in his video, described this as hospitals having to “prominently post all prices at their place of business,” arguing that “you will be able to shop, like you shop for anything else in life,” according to CBS News.
The plan also creates a “Plain English Insurance” standard that would force insurers to publish:
- Rate and coverage comparisons in plain language.
- The share of revenue they pay out in claims vs. overhead and profits.
- The percentage of claims they deny.
- Average wait times for routine care.
As a consumer, those rules could finally give you a side‑by‑side view of how efficiently different plans use your premium dollars and how often they say no when people file claims. If you’re the one managing a family budget, that distinction matters a lot more than any broad promise about “affordability.”
What’s missing: eligibility, timelines, and scope
For something called the Great Healthcare Plan, a surprising amount of practical detail is still missing.
CBS News described the announcement as a “framework” and said the plan was “sparse on details,” noting that the administration has been promising a comprehensive alternative to the ACA since Trump’s first term but still has not produced full legislative text, according to its Jan. 14 coverage. Al Jazeera wrote that Trump’s new proposal arrives “without clear funding or execution timelines,” even as Congress faces decisions about whether to extend or reshape expired ACA subsidy enhancements, according to the outlet’s report on the rollout.
CRFB flags that the fiscal impact of the ACA subsidy change “depends heavily on what the White House means by ‘extra taxpayer-funded subsidy payments,’” a phrase the White House uses in its marketing but does not carefully define in budget terms, the group wrote in its blog post. If “extra” refers only to temporary enhanced subsidies created during the pandemic, the numbers look one way; if it sweeps in base subsidies that are now part of the ACA’s long‑term structure, the ten‑year cost could be far higher.
From your point of view, there are three big blanks:
- Who qualifies. The plan keeps saying “eligible Americans” without spelling out income thresholds, family size rules, or phase‑outs, so you cannot yet tell whether you would get more help than you did under enhanced ACA subsidies, especially if you’re middle‑income in a high‑cost state.
- How the money arrives. CBS News reported that press secretary Karoline Leavitt suggested the administration envisions “health savings accounts or similar accounts that families can use to buy coverage,” but even that is a concept, not a fully designed benefit.
- When anything happens. Neither the White House fact sheet nor Trump’s remarks lay out a calendar for when Congress would vote or when new subsidies and rules would kick in, leaving your 2027 or 2028 enrollment plans in limbo.
Until those blanks are filled in by actual bill text, you are looking at a political roadmap, not a number you can plug into your personal health care budget.
Related: Dave Ramsey, AARP sound alarm on Medicare
